OK, the bug has mildly bitten me. Here are some further notes:
Phonemic inventory
Consonants
m n nʲ | 〈m n ň〉 |
p t tʲ k | 〈p t ť k 〉 |
b d dʲ ɡ | 〈b d ď g〉 |
s ʃ x | 〈s š h〉 |
z ʒ | 〈z ž〉 |
r | 〈r〉 |
w l j | 〈w l ľ〉 |
Vowels
i iː u uː | 〈i ī u ū〉 |
e eː o oː | 〈e ē o ō〉 |
a aː | 〈a ā〉 |
Feature ideas
- Split is based on [±volition]: [+volition] S/A, P; [-volition] S/P, A
- Different definite articles and/or pronouns for S/A and S/P?
- Maybe the same for all S, but differing object A and P depending on Ergative or Accusative?
- Wackernagel position affects definite articles (N Art, but Adj Art N) and maybe modal verbs (S-Mod-O-V – yes, I’m looking at you, German!)
- Wackernagel position also for possessive pronouns: stressed/unstressed forms here as well
- no distinction between A series of pronouns and possessive pronouns (I = my)
- maybe only direct vs. oblique case marking (if that works with split-A); otherwise small system with case markers from adpositions like Romance (SOV correllates with postpositions, however)
- definite article from “this” and “that”
- proclitic definite article full form; enclitic definite article unstressed form
- left-branching preferred, i.e. modifier-head order: Adj Noun and Possessor Noun
- The definite article may serve as a subordinator for chains of Poss-N (goes counter to the above rule of wackernageling the definite article, though! Either irregularity, or use a different morpheme …)
- John car of ‘John’s car’
- car I ‘my car’
- John car of the motor of ‘of the motor of John’s car’
- car I the motor of ‘of my car’s motor’
- inanimate nouns can’t serve as A
- non-S can’t be relativized: need for passives and applicatives
- most common verbs (e.g. be/sit, go, get, put) have suppletive or irregular forms, e.g. for past or plural
- have = be with/on?
Maybe it could look a bit like this:
[gloss]Srāt -m boď na marh ūt šaňt.
NOUN.A =DEF SOMETHING DEF.ACC NOUN.P done VERB[/gloss]
NOUN.A =DEF SOMETHING DEF.ACC NOUN.P done VERB[/gloss]